Democratic Presidential Nominee 2028

t1u2 Oct 12

Debate season will test these prices

siick Oct 8

The democrat party is extremely desperate to win back the elements of the jewish lobby that joined the GOP after Oct 7. They have been getting absolutely murdered in funding ever since. They want moderate to reassure the donors, and a Jewish moderate is even better

drachenlord1710 Sep 30

do people sleep on Tim?

NotaJoe Sep 30

USA

Ulve130kkaikelex Sep 27

Tim Walz odds are shifting fast, 2 shares hold

Tony61Montana Sep 25

Josh Shapiro easy choice: 1) Jewish 2) Wins at Pennsylvania which is a key state for presidency 3) Raised in a US Navy base 4) Old enough not to be inexperienced but also young enough not to be a dinosaur 5) Ex Attorney General of Pennsylvania... 6) Was attacked for being jewish--> In April 2025, Shapiro and his family survived an arson attack at the governor's mansion, hours after holding a Passover Seder. Very easy choice, trading super low for the potential it has.

ISMS2222 Sep 24

History shows that after a chaotic presidency, a steady leader can be exactly what the country wants. Gerald Ford followed Nixon and Watergate. Calvin Coolidge followed an administration engulfed in scandal. Eisenhower followed years of war and political tension under Truman. None was known for daily drama; each offered a calmer style. “Boring” can be a political strength when voters are exhausted. Calm, competent and predictable can sound pretty good after chaos.

CKAB Sep 24

It won't even matter if they have to give a senate seat to run him because the Dems will have like 55 secure seats at that point from Trump's incompetence and unpopularity.

0xc681414822F6b908ff19461882D518722D891296-1781464598639 Sep 24

...

ISMS2222 Sep 23

Don’t be scared of something that’s becoming increasingly obvious. Your mind will play tricks on you and make you overthink it, but this guy is the guy. Total package

CKAB Sep 23

Georgia is the Pennsylvania of 2028. It's clearly Ossoff.

CKAB Sep 23

Ossoff owns

CKAB Sep 23

They'd be right to. America still is not ready for a woman president.

CKAB Sep 23

The polls are meaningless right now and she's only leading in them because of inertia.

CKAB Sep 23

He's not going to run for prez after being a senator for basically 1.5 years max, bro.

CKAB Sep 23

Because 2020, 2024, and appearing with El-Sayed recently

snimuslivo4ki Sep 23

we need 40 cent yes?

bananajamsamin Sep 23

are you shure?

JoJojO-690 Sep 22

A crowded field could help the candidate with the most committed base

wantbehappy Sep 18

Kamala Harris not have a change guys why so high?

cocos228 Sep 16

i listed yes shares if u wanna buy

Golmand Sep 16

My crystal ball endorsed absolutely nobody💥

Hugewinner Sep 16

why not

Empiotreus Sep 15

Once James Talarico wins Texas, his odds will grow :)

cocos228 Sep 15

@hugewinner buy more

0xAe8739813B024631B3769E8788464795EE70d629-1776456987493 Sep 13

She had her shot. Very unlikely she gets another. "the dems field is terrible" well you're entitled to your opinion, but I don't think the democractic voters think so. Frankly, I suspect a lot of people will be hesitant to nominate a woman again in this cycle, fair or not.

0xAe8739813B024631B3769E8788464795EE70d629-1776456987493 Sep 13

Kelly is still obviously underpriced at 3 cents.

MaxShorter Sep 13

I remember vividly in 21 trump odds of winning the 2024 nominee were trading below 2c. The odds off the presidency much lower Everyone thought he was done after January 6th, impossible they said . The market had fatigue and bet on desantis and Hayley. He led all the polls, market didn’t care. Then he announced, yet price barely reacted , then he beat all the cases, and they finally fell in line. Then he won it all I feel similar fatigue is present with Kamala, the market desperately want someone new but the gods won’t give it. History often doesn’t repeat but it usually rhymes

MaxShorter Sep 13

Taking a position on Kamala harris ~ 8c, got limits through 7 and will add as we get closer to 2028. Thesis: Kamala is leading on virtually every 2028 poll, market consensus is that her lead will narrow as we get closer and other nominess get exposure, but I don't think thats the case. Firstly, the dems field is terrible, the nomination is there for the taking but nobody stands out. Newsom is uninspiring, AOC is a liability, Ossoff is closest but he’s not bridging the gap enough to the left as I’d like. Secondly, Kamala has the credibility, donor machine, and is most prepared for a presidential campaign. The biggest elephant in the room is that she lost 2024 and nobody will trust her again, but she was up against the greatest political machine of our generation - MAGA. Trump will not be running in 28, the likely opp is Vance or Rubio and neither have the strength or credibility that trump did last election

mrtrump Sep 12

donors want a white male

ocpna Sep 10

AES?

crypto-basenji Sep 8

I locked in Ossof because I know how dumb are leftists and they will choose that moron

ISMS2222 Aug 31

Keep an eye on Jon Ossoff after November. • $42M Senate war chest — federal money that can potentially move into a presidential campaign after Georgia. • ~90% of his current ad budget reportedly running outside Georgia. • Spending only $5–6M/month while reportedly bringing in more than he’s spending. • Gavin Newsom can’t simply transfer his California state campaign war chest into a federal presidential campaign. • Mark Kelly sits behind Ossoff at roughly $26M in federal cash. And here’s the interesting part: 📊 Ossoff’s presidential odds relative to his Democratic-nomination odds imply roughly a 70% chance of winning the presidency IF he becomes the nominee — stronger than the comparable implied number for the other candidates. $42M. National advertising. Positive cash flow. Maybe it’s all about Georgia. Maybe.

glally Aug 29

hakeem has a chance

jstD0It Aug 28

Angela Alsobrooks

SUPERNOVA- Aug 27

Ossoff is not going to vacate his senate seat, nice idea tho

ISMS2222 Aug 26

This is my call—not Moore for president. I accumulated 300,000 Wes Moore contracts at 1.5¢, a price nobody can get anymore. My thesis is simple: I think Moore gets a major South Carolina bump, particularly with Black Democratic voters, and that puts him firmly into the national conversation. I ultimately see Jon Ossoff winning the nomination and choosing Wes Moore as his VP. To me, Ossoff–Moore would be an incredibly strong general-election ticket—geographically, generationally, and demographically. If those two end up on the same ticket, I think it’s lights out. My call: Ossoff–Moore wins the Electoral College by 80+ votes.

SUPERNOVA- Aug 26

the last few times the DNC picked a woman it went really well so it should be great with AOC

nimatinos299992 Aug 26

never say never

jimceryt999 Aug 25

or 2030? why ?

BINGOman101999 Aug 25

its joke yeap?))

glally Aug 24

wes moore will never be president

jerobmu Aug 24

AOC clear choice

ISMS2222 Aug 23

Machbut watched AOC’s bloating and egg-freezing videos and immediately decided, ‘Yep, that’s my president,’ then raced out to buy AOC shares at literally any price. 😂

TaxIsTheft Aug 21

Mark my words…

ISMS2222 Aug 20

Your logic isn’t working in Michigan, and the Democratic establishment knows the danger: if 2028 becomes Newsom vs. AOC, AOC can eat him alive from the left. California is becoming political baggage for Newsom, not an asset. I was just there last week—the homelessness, open drug use and visible disorder are impossible to ignore. That’s why Ossoff makes so much strategic sense. Democrats need someone who can compete in the South, appeal to men and moderates, energize the base, and still run credibly in the Rust Belt. If Ossoff wins Georgia convincingly in 2026, he can point to something neither Newsom nor AOC can: proof that he can win a critical presidential battleground. And the DNC’s new calendar only strengthens that argument: South Carolina goes first, with Michigan also in the early window. The establishment doesn’t necessarily have to want Ossoff today. But if their objective is winning in 2028 and building a coalition that can hold through 2032, they may ultimately conclude he’s their best bridge between the progressive base and the voters Democrats have been losing. AOC can win the activist primary. Newsom can win the donor primary. Ossoff may be the one who can win the Electoral College.

SUPERNOVA- Aug 20

AOC is unelectable and Ossoff will not vacate his senate seat - nobody wants Kamala and the rest are worthless - that leaves only one real contender who can battle the GOP and has the donor money / institutional backing to actually win the presidency

ISMS2222 Aug 20

My hunch is that the recent AOC momentum may be overstated, while sophisticated money is quietly accumulating Ossoff at lower prices. The bigger strategic question is electability: Democrats may ultimately need a candidate who can recover male voters in the South and Rust Belt. Newsom’s problem is different. In a head-to-head Democratic primary against AOC, he’d be facing a progressive movement with unusually strong grassroots organization and a highly motivated primary electorate. Traditional establishment strength doesn’t necessarily translate into beating that kind of infrastructure.

retard2 Aug 19

AOC = Marco Rubio

Saffron-rose Aug 18

ok i feed this page to claude and claude let me buy jon ossoff. but i think it's just too early to talk aout anything. i will wait till 2026 year endd.